Standards
for good digital pedagogy is needed but not to the extent where the learners
and teachers are confined to only a particular set of standards. Standards in
its rightful form are normally set out as a guideline as how things are
supposed to happen, but could also be a form of indoctrinating a particular
form of learning. Standards as it is indicated in the article can "limit
the consciousness which critical pedagogy aims". I do not say that there
should be no standards, but standards should be implemented in such a way that
it can be bend for the benefit of learning. It is like I have said in my
previous blogs, that I cannot stress it more that whatever happens in the
classroom, learning should take place and the learner should walk out of any
given class with knowledge accumulated in any particular lesson. The teacher
should not be intimidated by standards or technology for example, but instead
make the learning environment conducive for learning with any tool available
that can progress knowledge, facilitate and educate learners. This should be
done to the best ability of the teacher, and technology or whatever teaching
method should be just a tool that can assist the learning process. Standards
can have the ability to "systematically oppress students...but students
and teachers should grapple with this culture of silence". Teachers should
be able to feel comfortable teaching, and not be a puppet leader that is
controlled by standards. Teachers should do what they deem necessary for their
learners to excel instead of being oppressed by standards and norms. Although
be in some instances difficult to do, teachers should be the educational
vehicle in which learners want to drive in order to get to their learning and
knowledge destination. Learning should not be debilitated because of standards
and learning should be able to occur individually as well as in group dynamics
where communication play a vital role for a conducive learning experience.
Learning should be a liberating experience and not make learners and teachers
feel that they are in shackles. Personally, I think that the more freedom a
learner has to learn, the better a student him/her will become and ultimately a
better citizen. I am not an expert on this topic of education and can only
speak from my own experience, but it does not take a rocket scientist to know
that a free learning environment is conducive to educational excellence.
I fully agree with you, I think the issue leis with the marriage or the engagement that exist between the teacher and the student. Furthermore if one has to look at the macro level, which is how the educational system is structured, it makes it very difficult for lets say ICT programs to work. I do think tech driven mediation on a distance level would enhance learner and engagement level with knowledge, the problem however lies with the accessibility of these tools and for me that lies with the structural composition of how education is structured.
ReplyDelete